Last update:
2023-10-07

PFAS/PFOS pollution by 3M, Belgium

Chemical multinational 3M has been releasing toxic PFAS into the environment since the 1970s. The company has been sued multiple times, and constructions of the Oosterweel Tunnel raised concerns among locals.



Description:

Multinational chemical company 3M released toxic per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) from its Zwijndrecht factory near Antwerp starting in the mid-1970s [1]. These so-called forever chemicals hardly ever break down and accumulate in the food chain and human bodies, posing a serious threat to ecosystems and public health. There are thousands of different PFAS, and they are popular in the industry for their resistance to moisture, grease, heat, and dirt. Although 3M knew of the environmental and health implications associated with PFAS, they continued producing and releasing them for decades.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:PFAS/PFOS pollution by 3M, Belgium
Country:Belgium
State or province:Antwerpen
Location of conflict:Zwijndrecht
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Industrial and Utilities conflicts
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Chemical industries
Landfills, toxic waste treatment, uncontrolled dump sites
Specific commodities:Chemical products
Project Details and Actors
Project details

- The 3M factory in Zwijndrecht has approximately 300 employees [15].

See more
Level of Investment for the conflictive project571,000,000 euro (sanitation and restoration)
Type of populationSemi-urban
Start of the conflict:1980
Company names or state enterprises:3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing company) from United States of America - Responsible for decades of PFAS pollution from its Zwijndrecht facility
Lantis (Beheersmaatschappij Antwerpen Mobiel (BAM)) from Belgium - Made a deal with 3M to use polluted soil for its Oosterweel project
Indaver from Belgium
Relevant government actors:- Openbare Vlaamse Afvalstoffenmaatschappij (OVAM)
- Vlaamse milieumaatschappij (VMM)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:- Grondrecht: https://grondrecht.eu
- Bond Beter Leefmilieu: https://www.bondbeterleefmilieu.be
- Greenpeace: https://www.greenpeace.org/belgium/nl/
- Darkwater 3M: https://www.darkwater3m.be
- Climaxi: https://www.climaxi.be
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stageMobilization for reparations once impacts have been felt
Groups mobilizing:International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Local scientists/professionals
Fisher people
Forms of mobilization:Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Development of a network/collective action
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Official complaint letters and petitions
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Food insecurity (crop damage), Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Air pollution, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity)
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Potential: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Other Health impacts
Other Health impactsHealth impacts from PFAS exposure include: decreased fertility, high blood pressure among pregnant women, birth defects, developmental effects, heightened risk of prostate, kidney, and testicular cancer, negative impacts on the immune system, hormone changes, and heightened cholesterol levels.
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of livelihood
Potential: Violations of human rights, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Project temporarily suspended
Proposal and development of alternatives:Local residents and environmental action groups argue for the immediate discontinuation of all PFAS by 3M. Some groups also argue against the Oosterweel construction project out of concern over further unintended exposure to PFAS. The relocation of polluted soil to 3M property raises concerns over exposure, but is supported by some parties as collecting polluted soil at the company grounds heightens the chances of effective sanitation efforts [8].
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:3M has announced its plans to discontinue the use of all PFAS from its operations by the end of 2025 [15]. The mass claim for compensation (a class action suit) is still in process and although 3M has to invest substantially in environmental sanitation, it is impossible to fully undo PFAS pollution once it has been released into the environment.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[2] VPRO Documentary. (6/8/2022). Illegal dumping of toxic substances – VPRO Documentary. Youtube.
[click to view]

[4] Zembla. (1/9/2022). Het PFAS-schandaal. BNN VARA.
[click to view]

[3] Lefevere, F. (8/7/2021). 3M loosde te grote hoeveelheden PFOS in de Schelde en de overheid wist dat, maar reageerde jarenlang amper. VRT NWS.
[click to view]

[5] Salvidge, R. & Hosea, L. (23/2/2023). Revealed: scale of ‘forever chemical’ pollution across UK and Europe. The Guardian.
[click to view]

[6] NOS. (26/10/2021). Vlaams gezondheidsagentschap: te hoge pfas-waarden in lichaam omwonenden 3M.
[click to view]

[7] Lory, G. (13/3/2023). Residents of Belgian town living through nightmare of ‘forever chemical’ pollution. Euronews.
[click to view]

[8] Jacobs, S. (9/7/2021). Bewoners stellen gemeente Zwijndrecht en Antwerpen in gebreke in kader van Oosterweelwerken. Greenpeace.
[click to view]

[9] Greenpeace Belgium. (14/7/2021). ACTIE! We protesteren tegen PFOS-vervuiler 3M in

Zwijndrecht. Greenpeace.
[click to view]

[10] Greenpeace. (n.d.). De vervuiler betaalt.
[click to view]

[11] Raad van State verwerpt beroep van chemiebedrijf 3M: deel van productie moet wél worden stilgelegd. VRT NWS.
[click to view]

[12] The Brussels Times. (16/5/2023). PFAS pollution: 3M ordered to compensate affected family.
[click to view]

[13] Darkwater 3M. (n.d.). Het PFAS/PFOS probleem.
[click to view]

[14] BJS. (1/7/2023). Massaklacht tegen chemiereus 3M: actiegroep eist 20.000 euro per buurtbewoner. AD.
[click to view]

[15] Greenpeace Belgium. (2/1/2023). PFAS: 3M kapt wereldwijd met ‘eeuwige chemicaliën’. Greenpeace.
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

[1] Bloomberg Originals. (23/12/2022). The Toxic Legacy of 3M’s ‘Forever Chemicals’. Youtube.
[click to view]

New documentary. 12 June 2023. The class action against 3M in the TV program Een Today by Avro/Tros in the Netherlands. Citizen collective of people in and around Zwijndrecht, Darkwater 3M, launches a class action against chemical company 3M in Belgium.
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Layla van der Donk
Last update07/10/2023
Conflict ID:6435
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.