Petronas, a Malaysian fossil fuel company, has a proposal for a $40 billion natural gas export facility on Lelu Island (Lax U'u'la in the Tsimshian language). The current BC Liberal party government headed by Christy Clark has been 100% behind all energy development, especially fracked gas. The current federal Liberal party (led by Justin Trudeau) has fallen in line, supporting oil and gas against First Nations wishes, both generally and in this specific case. While fracking has widespread resistance in Canada, this project is particularly resisted because of its location. Around Lelu Island is an eel grass habitat (the Flora Banks) which is essential for the transition of salmon from freshwater to saltwater. Approximately 90% of the salmon of the Skeena River (the third largest salmon river in the world by number of salmon) spend their transition phase in this habitat, which scientists have shown would be obliterated by the changes in tidal flows caused by the construction of this export facility. The salmon population of the Skeena would be devastated. Because of its inevitable impact on the salmon, there is widespread resistance from communities and activist groups throughout the Skeena watershed and amongst fishermen of the region, the majority of whose salmon come from the Skeena. Lelu Island is the traditional territory of the Gitwilgyoots clan, one of the Tsimshian nations of Lax Kw'alaams. The clan, speaking through their spokesmen, Simoyget Yahaan (Don Wesley) and Ligitgyet Gwis Hawaal (Ken Lawson) have declared their complete opposition to the project and have initiated what is now an ongoing re-occupation of Lelu Island to prevent survey work in support of the facility , which has involved regular evictions of Petronas-employed workers from the territory. To an outsider, First Nations politics in Canada can be very confusing, and this confusion is itself used strategically by industry. There are parallel governments for First Nations: the traditional 'hereditary' system and the imposed colonial Indian Act band councils. The Canadian Supreme Court, in the 1993 Delgamukw ruling established that the hereditary leadership is the proper authority in cases like the Tsimshian, where no treaty was ever signed surrendering sovereignty. Still industry and government attempt to work through band councils (or whoever will be coopted) in 'Divide and Conquer' tactics. The current Indian Act government of Lax Kw'alaams is headed by a family that is heavily invested in oil and gas expansion and has given their approval to Petronas, which government and industry use to attempt to represent themselves as having necessary First Nations buy-in. The Divide and Conquer tactics run deep. -- update... on July 25, 2017, Petronas announced that it would no longer be pursuing the project, a victory for salmon, the Skeena River, Gitwilgyoots, and the people of BC! Now resistance is moving to the parallel Chinese Aurora LNG project on neghboring Digby Island. This is the other primary proposed LNG export facility in the area, representing a parallel threat to the salmon of the Skeena. |
Name of conflict: | Gitwilgyoots and Lelu Island (Lax U'u'la) vs proposed Petronas LNG export facility, Canada |
Country: | Canada |
State or province: | British Columbia |
Location of conflict: | Lelu Island |
Accuracy of location | HIGH (Local level) |
Type of conflict. 1st level: | Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy |
Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Oil and gas refining Oil and gas exploration and extraction Ports and airport projects Shale gas fracking Land acquisition conflicts Aquaculture and fisheries Gas flaring Water access rights and entitlements Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines) Wetlands and coastal zone management Invasive species Pollution related to transport (spills, dust, emissions) |
Specific commodities: | Natural Gas |
Project details | CH4: The facility would produce as much as 19.2 million metric tons a year of LNG and open up a new trade route for Canadian gas to be shipped to Asia. CO2 Emissions: Petrons's Pacific Northwest LNG would annually emit between 11.5 and 14 megatonnes, including upstream emissions The plant has been demonstrated in the company's own tidal flow models to destroy the critical eel grass salmon habitat of the Flora Banks, one of the largest salmon rivers in the world. 90% of salmon leaving the Skeena spend their transition phase in the Flora Banks. Between 300 million and 1 billion juvenile salmon leave the Skeena each year, and 3 million to 10 million adults return each year. (Note, the "100,000 people affected" to the right is a ballpark number of the people who have direct connections in terms of food, business, or identity to the salmon of the Skeena River. The actual number of people affected by this project is much larger, in terms of both impacts on the salmon and impacts on climate change, among other impacts.) |
Project area: | 100 |
Level of Investment for the conflictive project | 40,000,000,000 |
Type of population | Rural |
Affected Population: | 100,000 |
Start of the conflict: | 01/09/2015 |
End of the conflict: | 25/07/2017 |
Company names or state enterprises: | PETRONAS from Malaysia |
Relevant government actors: | BC Liberals (Christy Clark- premier) Liberal Party (Justin Trudeau - prime minister) |
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | Gitwilgyoots clan of the Tsimshian: http://www.laxuula.com/ Skeena Wild: https://skeenawild.org/ Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition: http://skeenawatershed.com/ Friends of Wild Salmon: http://friendsofwildsalmon.ca/campaigns/detail/liquefied_natural_gas_lng_development/lelu_island/ |
Intensity | MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization) |
Reaction stage | PREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase) |
Groups mobilizing: | Indigenous groups or traditional communities Local ejos Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Recreational users Local scientists/professionals The Tsimshian First nation Fisher people |
Forms of mobilization: | Artistic and creative actions (eg guerilla theatre, murals) Blockades Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..) Creation of alternative reports/knowledge Development of a network/collective action Involvement of national and international NGOs Land occupation Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Media based activism/alternative media Objections to the EIA Official complaint letters and petitions Public campaigns Street protest/marches Arguments for the rights of mother nature Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment |
Environmental Impacts | Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming, Noise pollution, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity |
Other Environmental impacts | Many concerns, but the biggest concern specific to this LNG plant is its placement on critical salmon habitat for the 3rd largest salmon bearing river in the world. |
Health Impacts | Potential: Accidents, Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..), Health problems related to alcoholism, prostitution |
Other Health impacts | These boom/bust projects have many health and social impacts associated with temporary man-camps |
Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors Potential: Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place |
Project Status | Stopped |
Conflict outcome / response: | Corruption Land demarcation Court decision (undecided) Strengthening of participation New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study Project cancelled Withdrawal of company/investment Petronas announced a decision to not pursue the project on July 25, 2017 |
Proposal and development of alternatives: | The First Nations communities don't want the project. "Life as is is just fine." |
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | Yes |
Briefly explain: | It has mobilized Gitwilgyoots to firmly claim their territorial rights. It is a crime that Gitwilgyoots and activists had to waste so much resources to prevent the project, but they were successful in preventing it. In a more just world Petronas would have to reimburse the community for forcing them to waste so much of their lives in resistance. |
Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc) |
| ||||
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| ||||
| |||||
Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
|
Contributor: | Karl Frost, PhD, Institut de Ciencia i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona |
Last update | 18/08/2019 |
Conflict ID: | 2554 |
Images |
|
Sockeye Smolt in Eelgrass
by Brian Huntington
|