As part of its broader plans to frack in Northern and Southern Ireland, energy firm Tamboran Resources submitted an application to drill a shale gas exploration well at Belcoo near Enniskillen in County Fermanagh, north of Ireland (one of the six counties administered under UK rule). The shale exploration well would be the first drilled in Ireland and is targeted on the Bundoran Shale, to a depth of around 750m. The fracking site is in an abandoned quarry north of Gardrum Road behind the main Acheson & Glover quarry. The Australian company had hoped to discern whether there was enough shale gas in the region to warrant a formal licence to construct a fracking operation there. But the Belcoo site, renowned for its pristine natural beauty, subsequently became the focus of 24-7 demonstrations attended by local politicians, farmers, and campaigners who were stringently opposed to the prospect of hydraulic fracturing in their locale. A protest camp was set up outside the site and the community organized to resist Tamboran’s plans in the Belcoo Frack Free campaign. Initially, the company's license was for three years, during which they were to do some works, including drilling a borehole and analysing rock samples. The company attempted to bypass the need for full planning permission to drill at Cleggan Quarry, relying solely on legislation relating to “permitted development rights.” Under this legislation, the firm could have drilled the borehole without carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In March 2014 they requested a six-month extension on this license to finish the work (until 30th September). In July they arrived on site in Belcoo with the intention of drilling the 1,200m borehole in the Acheson and Glover quarry, which ignited an extensive protest by residents, farmers and campaigners, together with a 24-hour camp at the quarry entrance. No drilling rig arrived. Instead, it was discovered by campaigners that the quarry did not have planning permission for activities that had already taken place – excavation, blasting and removal of rock. Also, there were questions over the environmental impacts of these activities on a stream that runs from the quarry into Lough MacNean. Following careful consideration and numerous letters from concerned locals and political representatives, Minister Durkan declared on August 11th 2014 that a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was warranted before such planning permission could be issued. On 30th September their license expired and the Minister Arlene Foster has not allowed another extension and terminated the license. However Tamboran is planning to challenge this in court. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC), a mammoth global auditing firm, estimates shale gas deposits in Northern Ireland may fetch as much as £80 billion - or approximately 1.5 billion barrels of oil. Other experts disagree, however, emphasizing the economic costs of fracking [1]. |
Name of conflict: | Belcoo Community Fracking Blockade, Northern Ireland, UK |
Country: | United Kingdom |
State or province: | Fermanagh, Northern Ireland |
Location of conflict: | Belcoo |
Accuracy of location | MEDIUM (Regional level) |
Type of conflict. 1st level: | Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy |
Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Shale gas fracking |
Specific commodities: | Natural Gas |
Project details | Shale gas deposits in Northern Ireland, mostly in Fermanagh, could be worth about £80 billion, according to a report by consulting firm PwC. The reserves have been estimated as equivalent to about 1.5 billion barrels of oil. |
Level of Investment for the conflictive project | 4,731,300 |
Type of population | Rural |
Affected Population: | 500 |
Start of the conflict: | 01/03/2014 |
End of the conflict: | 30/09/2014 |
Company names or state enterprises: | Tamboran Resources from Australia - Extractive company |
Relevant government actors: | Department of the Environment Northern Ireland |
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | Fermanagh Fracking Awareness Network (FFAN) Love Leitrim Belcoo Frack Free |
Intensity | MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization) |
Reaction stage | PREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase) |
Groups mobilizing: | Farmers Local ejos Local government/political parties Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Fisher people |
Forms of mobilization: | Artistic and creative actions (eg guerilla theatre, murals) Blockades Creation of alternative reports/knowledge Development of a network/collective action Involvement of national and international NGOs Media based activism/alternative media Objections to the EIA Official complaint letters and petitions Public campaigns Street protest/marches Property damage/arson The family home of a site worker suffered a petrol bomb attack (early August 2014). However, this was highly criticized by the Anti-fracking campaign group Belcoo Frack Free. |
Environmental Impacts | Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems |
Health Impacts | Potential: Accidents |
Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Increase in violence and crime, Militarization and increased police presence Potential: Loss of livelihood, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors |
Project Status | Stopped |
Conflict outcome / response: | Court decision (undecided) Application of existing regulations Project temporarily suspended |
Proposal and development of alternatives: | The protesters demand an EIS at the minimum |
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | Yes |
Briefly explain: | The company could not go ahead with its plans and therefore environmental damage has been avoided. However, the company is to take a judicial review against Environment Minister Mark H Durkan’s decision on Belcoo quarry and Enterprise Minister Arlene Foster’s decision not to extend their license in order to to get a compensation. |
Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc) |
| ||||||
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| ||||||
| |||||||
Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
|
Contributor: | Alfred Burballa Noria PhD candidate Ulster University |
Last update | 18/08/2019 |
Conflict ID: | 1542 |
Images |
|
Anti-fracking camp
Image of the camp set up to protest against fracking. Courtesy of Dawid Stanczak.
|
|
Anti-fracking protest
Protestors gathering at the fracking site. Courtesy of Dawid Stanczak.
|
|
An Irish man protests plans to frack in Southern Ireland. (Photo from Twitter/@LoveLeitrim)
Source: http://rt.com/uk/177852-fracking-ireland-campaign-risks/
|