Please zoom in or out and select the base layer according to your preference to make the map ready for printing, then press the Print button above.

Alta River Hydro Power Plant, Norway


Description:

In 1968, the Norwegian government produced plans for the construction of a hydroelectrical power station in Altaälven (Alta river). When the project, which included building a 110 m high dam that would put the entire Sami village Masi under water, reached the public, massive protests broke out and marked the beginning of a long complex conflict.

Sami people living by the river, with support from EJOs and others, argued that damming the river would lead to highly negative consequences for the reindeer herding (a traditional practice of the Sami people). Arguments brought forward were also that it would severely affect the salmon fishing as well as the agriculture in the area.

The protests started in 1970 and continued until 1982. A multitude of protests took place: land was occupied, Sami people hunger struck and occupied the office of the Norwegian Prime Minister in Oslo as well as put up a camp outside the Norwegian Parliament, the Pope was contacted for support, and three Sami people threatened with self-immolation.

On the 12th of January in 1981 the Norwegian government sent 10% of the total police force of the country (600 police) to a place called Nollpunkten (Point Zero) where protesters camped to hinder construction machines from reaching the place where the dam was to be built. This was the largest police operation in Norway since World War II. 30 years after the conflict, the Norwegian government confessed that they were very close to sending military forces to remove the protesters from the occupied land.

On the 19th of March 1982 three Sami people attempted to blow up a bridge crossing the Tverr River, leading to one of them losing an arm and an eye.

Several times the case of building the power station faced retrial in court but in the end the project was carried out, with the exception that the Masi village remained unaffected by the construction. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

Basic Data

Name of conflict:Alta River Hydro Power Plant, Norway
Country:Norway
State or province:Finnmark
Location of conflict:Alta
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)

Source of Conflict

Type of conflict. 1st level:Water Management
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Dams and water distribution conflicts
Specific commodities:Electricity

Project Details and Actors

Project details

The Alta river conflict refers to a series of massive protests in Norway in the late 1970s and early 1980s concerning the construction of a hydroelectric power plant in the Alta river in Finnmark, Northern Norway. The dam that was built in the Sautso canyon is 110 meters high. The hydro power station produces approximately 655 GWh per year. The original plan was that it would produce 1,400 GWh per year but this changed in 1970 since the plan to flood the village of Masi was met with strong resistance.

Level of Investment for the conflictive project15,400,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:~350 (in the original plan to flood Masi village)
Start of the conflict:1970
Company names or state enterprises:Statkraft from Norway
Relevant government actors:Norwegian Ministry of the Environment, Norwegian water resources and electricity board
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Norske Samers Riksforbund (NSR), http://nsr.no/, Norske Reindriftsamers Landsforbund (NRL), http://www.nrl-nbr.no/, Alta municipality, http://www.alta.kommune.no/, Kautokeino municipality, http://www.kautokeino.kommune.no/, Folkeaksjonen mot utbygging av Alta/Kautokeino-vassdraget (1978-1982), The World Council of Indigenous Peoples (WCIP) (dissolved in 1996), The International Indian Treaty Council (IITC), http://www.iitc.org/

Conflict & Mobilization

IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Pastoralists
Local scientists/professionals
Fisher people
Forms of mobilization:Hunger strikes and self immolation
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Official complaint letters and petitions
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Sabotage
Development of alternative proposals
Property damage/arson
Land occupation
Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment
Media based activism/alternative media
Blockades
Public campaigns
Development of a network/collective action
Street protest/marches
Involvement of national and international NGOs

Impacts

Environmental ImpactsVisible: Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Soil erosion
Socio-economical ImpactsPotential: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place

Outcome

Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Court decision (failure for environmental justice)
Negotiated alternative solution
Violent targeting of activists
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:Since the Norwegian government, despite the massive protests from Sami people, EJOs and others, carried out the plan to build the dam and power station in the Alta river, this might not be considered a success for environmental justice. On the other hand, however, thanks to the continuous strong protests, the rights of Sami people were brought up on the Norwegian national political agenda, leading to legislation that strenghtened the rights of Sami people in Norway. Much thanks to the conflict, Norway was also the first country to ratify ILOs convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal peoples, strenghtening the rights of the Sami people further. This was a "productive" conflict - one might say.

Sources & Materials

Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc)

ILO convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal peoples,
http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169

Finnmarkslagen,
http://www.lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-06-17-85

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

(5) Stein Dalland, 1983, The Alta Case: Learning from the Errors made in a Human Ecological Conflict in Norway, Geoforum, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 193-203.

(4) Svein S. Andersen and Atle Midttun, 1985, Conflict and local Mobilization: The Alta Hydropower Project, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 317—335.

Åsmund Lindal and Helge Sunde, 1981, Alta bilder:

års kamp for Alta-Kautokeinovassdraget, Oslo: Pax

Robert Paine, 1982, Dam a river, damn a people? : Saami (Lapp) livelihood and the Alta/Kautokeino hydro-electric project and the Norwegian parliament, IWGIA Document 45,
http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/0102_45_Dam_a_river.pdf

(1) Alta-saken, Store Norske Leksikon,
http://snl.no/Alta-saken

(2) Alta-konflikten, från civil olydnad till samisk terrorism, P3 Dokumentär, Sveriges Radio P3, (radio documentary)
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/44486?programid=2519

Svart hånd, hvit snø., 1995, Norsk Rikskringkasting (NRK), (radio documentary)
http://www.nrk.no/nett-tv/klipp/793172/

Ville bruke soldater i Alta-aksjon, 2006, Aftenposten,
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article1280217.ece

(3) En timme ifrån militärt ingripande i Alta, Sveriges Radio,
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2327&artikel=4147272

Meta information

Contributor:Linda Dubec
Last update31/01/2020
Conflict ID:415

Images