Please zoom in or out and select the base layer according to your preference to make the map ready for printing, then press the Print button above.

Gold mining and mercury pollution, Suriname


Description:

Gold mining has developed itself into the backbone of the Surinamese economy, accounting for 80% of the country’s exports and a large share of government revenues [1]. During Dutch rule, gold already constituted the main export commodity of which most profits were captured by the colonizers. Between 2000 and 2014, gold mining activities underwent an 893 percent increase, reaching an annual official production of 32.8 tons in 2019 [2]. These numbers, however, are likely a gross underestimation of the true scope of gold mining activity because mining in Suriname predominantly takes place informally.  

Most of Suriname is covered by the Greenstone Belt, which is rich in minerals and therefore of great interest to gold miners. With a forest cover of 93%, Suriname is among the most forested countries in the world [3]. Suriname is home to some of the most intact primary forests in South America. Gold mining is the biggest source of deforestation in Suriname [1]. As tracks of forest are cleared, mining operations threaten local biodiversity through loss of habitat [4]. 

Suriname is home to both artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM) and large-scale gold mining (LSM). There are two multinational gold mining firms operating in Suriname: Canadian company IAMGOLD, which owns Brokopondo and Rosebel Gold Mines, and American company Newmont, which owns Merian and Sipaliwini mines [5]. By 2023 Rosebel belongs to Zinjin, from China.

Since the 1990s, ASM practices have been growing rapidly [6]. Informal mining has become responsible for most of the Surinamese gold production [7]. Approximately a third of ASM producers are of Surinamese descent, and the remaining two-thirds of foreign migrants are mostly of Chinese origin or Brazilian garimpeiros [8]. Maroon people, who are descendants of formerly enslaved people of African descent, constitute a large share of ASM producers. Many inhabitants of Maroon villages have become economically dependent on gold mining, either because they mine themselves or because they rent out their lands to miners [1]. In many mining villages gold is an accepted payment method [9]. 

Mercury and cyanide are widely used by gold miners to separate gold particles from the soil. Although there have been no legal transactions demonstrating mercury imports for decades, estimates show that Suriname must be among the biggest mercury users in the world [1]. As mercury is released into rivers through the gold mining process, these waters are polluted, and mercury levels increase higher up the food chain through bioaccumulation. As such, big fish species such as anjumara’s and piranha’s, which form an important source of protein for communities in the interior lands of Suriname, carry high levels of mercury [1; 4]. Many Surinamese communities no longer have access to safe drinking water and can no longer consume the fish their livelihoods have depended on for generations. Women and girls tend to be responsible for bringing water in interior communities, where poor water quality and waterborne diseases form a serious issue [5].

According to the World Health Organization, mercury is among the ten most threatening chemicals to public health, and once released, mercury can remain in the soil for thousands of years [4]. Even in small amounts, mercury can have severe neurological and behavioral impacts. The health effects of mercury exposure are illustrated by the Minamata disease, which is characterized by symptoms such as hearing loss, muscle weakness, numbness, and insanity. In large concentrations, mercury exposure can lead to coma and death [9]. 

High levels of mercury have been measured among interior communities of Suriname, especially among people who consume diets high in fish. Mercury pollution not only puts communities living near mining sites at risk, but settlements further downstream polluted rivers are affected as well, meaning that most of the Surinamese population is at risk.

With most informal gold mining taking place in remote regions, ASM communities are generally characterized by low levels of formal education. As such,  it is alleged that there tends to be a lack of awareness of the dangers involved with the use of mercury in gold mining [9]. Besides, as the negative impacts of mercury pollution are noticeable in the long run and short-term gains are easily accessible, mercury continues to be used even if miners are aware of its impacts on their own health and livelihoods [10].

Cyanide is predominantly used by Chinese miners who can legally import the substance. Cyanide becomes poisonous once exposed to sunlight, and there are various reports of dead fish, dead chickens, and stomach problems among children in Surinamese communities connected to cyanide use [8].

In 2011, the Gold Sector Regulation Commission (OGS) was set up to inventorize the national gold mining sector and to evict illegal mining camps. However, the Surinamese government does not have sufficient environmental and social policies in place governing the mining sector [10]. Because most gold mining in Suriname takes place in remote locations, there is also hardly any surveillance on mining activity. Suriname is also the only South American country that does not enforce the Minamata Convention, which is an international agreement to control mercury trade, use, and pollution [6]. But there is also use of mercury mining in other countries. 

Suriname is one of the few Amazonian countries that has not ratified the right to Prior, Free and Informed Consent (PFIC) [1]. In some instances, therefore, mining takes place without permission from indigenous peoples, whose lands are predominately the targets of gold miners. For instance, Surgold’s Merian mine was created on Pamake peoples’ lands without consultation of these traditional landholders, and some Pamake people were evicted in the process. The Inter-American Human Rights Court has repeatedly ruled against Suriname for violating the rights of the Moiwana, Saramaka, Kaliña, and Lokono indigenous peoples [1].

Gold mines attract crime, and armed robberies are common [5]. Gold miners therefore usually equip themselves with (illegal) weaponry. The Suriname Police Corps is severely understaffed and underfunded, and corruption in the police force is a significant issue. Mining concession areas tend to fall into the hands of powerful individuals. Large mining concession areas tend to be given out to powerful individuals, such as Surinamese vice president and former guerilla leader Ronnie Brunswijk and ex-president Desi Bouterse, who are two of the most powerful Surinamese concession holders [1].

Basic Data

Name of conflict:Gold mining and mercury pollution, Suriname
Country:Suriname
State or province:Countrywide
Location of conflict:(Primarily) Paramaribo, Wanica, and Commewijne districts
Accuracy of locationLOW (Country level)

Source of Conflict

Type of conflict. 1st level:Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Mining exploration and/or ore extraction
Tailings from mines
Mineral processing
Specific commodities:Gold
Mercury

Project Details and Actors

Project details

- 924 hectares of Brownsberg Nature park have been deforested for the mining industry [11].

- An estimated 12,000 to 15,000 artisanal and small-scale gold miners are active in Suriname [7].

- Approximately 50 tons of mercury are released into the Environment per year in Suriname [2]. [12]

Regarding foreign companies, by February 2023, it was announced that

Canadian miner Iamgold completed the divestment of its 95% stake in Rosebel Gold Mines N.V. to China's Zijin Mining Group [13].

Project area:41,136 (low estimate)
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:400,000 (combined population of the Paramaribo, Wanica, and Comewijne districts, through which the mercury-polluted Commewijne and Saramacca rivers flow)
Start of the conflict:01/01/1990
Company names or state enterprises:IAMGOLD from Canada - One of the two multinational oil mining firms active in Suriname
Newmont Mining Corporation from United States of America
Surgold (Suriname Gold Company) from Suriname
Rosebel Gold Mines N.V. from China
Relevant government actors:- Gold Sector Regulation Commission (OGS)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Probios (foundation to protect our biodiversity Suriname): https://www.probios.org

Conflict & Mobilization

IntensityLATENT (no visible organising at the moment)
Reaction stageLATENT (no visible resistance)
Groups mobilizing:International ejos
Forms of mobilization:Involvement of national and international NGOs
Public campaigns

Impacts

Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Mine tailing spills
Potential: Air pollution
Health ImpactsPotential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..), Occupational disease and accidents
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood
Potential: Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Specific impacts on women, Loss of landscape/sense of place

Outcome

Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Proposal and development of alternatives:Much like in Guyana, Suriname’s gold industry is propped up by a black market for mercury, the toxic metal used in the extraction process. [12 ]. Although many parties argue for a complete ban on mercury import and use, some are concerned of the economic toll such a ban would have on poor Surinamese communities if no alternative is offered.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:Large scale and illegal gold mining activities continue to have a devastating impact on forest ecosystems and public health. Although new regulations concerning mercury trade and the right to prior, free, and informed consent are before parliament, these have not yet been made concrete, which means that gold mining can follow its course of destruction without sharpening policies. A remaining topic to be researched is to what extent ASM manages its exports through large mining companies.

Sources & Materials

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[9] VICE. (8/3/2017). Mining the Golden Mountains of Suriname With An Ex-Rebel Leader. Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwUOUY8fKl4

[1] Lyons, C. & Espinosa, C. (14/9/2022). Can Two New Bills Reshape Indigenous Rights and Illegal Gold Mining in Suriname? Mongabay.
https://news.mongabay.com/2022/09/can-two-new-bills-reshape-indigenous-rights-and-illegal-gold-mining-in-suriname/

[2] Amazon Aid. (n.d.). Gold mining in Amazon countries: an overview.
https://amazonaid.org/trackingamazongold/gold-mining/

[3] REDD+ Suriname. (n.d.). REDD+ Suriname.
https://www.surinameredd.org/en/reddplus-suriname/

[4] Joshi, A. (30/10/2015). Gold mining explodes in Suriname, puts forests and people at risk. Mongabay.
https://news.mongabay.com/2015/10/gold-mining-explodes-in-suriname-puts-forests-and-people-at-risk/

[5] Heemskerk, M. & Duijves, C. (May 2017). Socio-economic, health and environmental impacts of mining in Suriname, with a focus on Artisanal and Small-scale gold Mining. Social Solutions.
http://social-solutions.net/data/images/reports/Environmental_health_and_social_Impacts_FINAL_150517.pdf

[6] Department against Transnational Organized Crime (DTOC). (March 2023). On the trail of illicit gold proceeds: strengthening the fight against illegal mining finances.
https://www.oas.org/en/sms/dtoc/docs/suriname-eng-digital.pdf

[7] National Committee of the Netherlands (IUCN). (2019). The political ecology of mercury within the small-scale gold sector.
https://www.iucn.nl/app/uploads/2021/03/regional_mercury_report_suriname.pdf

[8] Jurna, N. (22/5/2023). Onrust in Suriname na cyanide-lek, water grootste stuwmeer verontreinigd. NOS.
https://nos.nl/artikel/2476103-onrust-in-suriname-na-cyanide-lek-water-grootste-stuwmeer-verontreinigd

[10] Seccatore J. & De Theije, M. (15/2/2017). Socio-technical study of small-scale gold mining in Suriname. Journal of Cleaner Production.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652616321801

[11] Joshi, A. (4/11/2015). Gold mining boom threatens communities in Suriname. Mongabay.
https://news.mongabay.com/2015/11/gold-mining-boom-threatening-communities-in-suriname/

[13 ] Iamgold concludes deal to offload Rosebel Gold Mines in Suriname. Rosebel Gold owns a 100% stake in the Rosebel Gold Mine and a 70% interest in the Saramacca Mine in Suriname. 2 Febr. 2023.
https://www.mining-technology.com/projects/rosebel-gold-project-suriname/

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

[12] Dialogo Chino. The gold rush threatening the world's greenest country. By Bram Ebus and Wilfred Lee Unwin. 14 Sept. 2020.
https://dialogochino.net/en/extractive-industries/37382-mercury-the-gold-rush-threatening-the-worlds-greenest-country-suriname/

Meta information

Contributor:Layla van der Donk
Last update26/09/2023
Conflict ID:6425

Images

 

Small scale gold mining (ASM) on deforested lands

https://www.amazonteam.org/maps/suriname-gold/